← back

I Use Obsidian

hisamafahri | 2026-02-17 22:30 UTC | source

I use Obsidian to think, take notes, write essays, and publish this site. This is my bottom-up approach to note-taking and organizing things I am interested in. It embraces chaos and laziness to create emergent structure.

In Obsidian, a “vault” is simply a folder of files. This is important because it adheres to my file over app philosophy. If you want to create digital artifacts that last, they must be files you can control, in formats that are easy to retrieve and read. Obsidian gives you that freedom.

The following is in no way dogmatic, just one example of how you can use Obsidian. Take the parts you like.

Vault template

  1. Download my vault or clone it from the Github repo.
  2. Unzip the .zip file to a folder of your choosing.
  3. In Obsidian open the folder as a vault.

Personal rules

Rules I follow in my personal vault:

  • Avoid splitting content into multiple vaults.
  • Avoid folders for organization.
  • Avoid non-standard Markdown.
  • Always pluralize categories and tags.
  • Use internal links profusely.
  • Use YYYY-MM-DD dates everywhere.
  • Use the 7-point scale for ratings.
  • Keep a single to-do list per week.

Having a consistent style collapses hundreds of future decisions into one, and gives me focus. For example, I always pluralize tags so I never have to wonder what to name new tags. Choose rules that feel comfortable to you and write them down. Make your own style guide. You can always change your rules later.

Folders and organization

I use very few folders. I avoid folders because many of my entries belong to more than one area of thought. My system is oriented towards speed and laziness. I don’t want the overhead of having to consider where something should go.

I do not use nested sub-folders. I do not use the file explorer much for navigation. I mostly navigate using the quick switcher, backlinks, or links within a note.

My notes are primarily organized using the categories property. Categories display an overview of related notes, using the bases feature in Obsidian.

Most of my notes are in the root of the vault, not a folder. This where I write about my personal world: journal entries, essays, evergreen notes, and other personal notes. If a note is in the root, I know it’s something I wrote, or relates directly to me.

Two reference folders I use:

  • References where I write about things that exist outside my world. Books, movies, places, people, podcasts, etc. Always named using the title e.g. Book title.md or Movie title.md.
  • Clippings where I save things other people wrote, mostly essays and articles.

Three admin folders exist so that their contents don’t show up in the file navigation:

  • Attachments for images, audio, videos, PDFs, etc.
  • Daily for my daily notes, all named YYYY-MM-DD.md. I do not write anything in daily notes, they exist solely to be linked to from other entries.
  • Templates for templates.

Two folders are present in the downloadable version of my vault for the sake of clarity. In my personal vault, these notes would be in the root, not a folder.

  • Categories contains top-level overviews of notes per category (e.g. Books, Movies, Podcasts, etc).
  • Notes contains example notes.

I use internal links profusely throughout my notes. I try to always link the first mention of something. My journal entries are often a stream of consciousness cataloging recent events, finding connections between things. Often the link is unresolved, meaning that the note for that link isn’t created yet. Unresolved links are important because they are breadcrumbs for future connections between things.

A journal entry in the root of my vault might look something like this:

I went to see the movie [[Perfect Days]] with [[Aisha]] at [[Vidiots]] and had Filipino food at [[Little Ongpin]]. I loved this quote from Perfect Days: [[Next time is next time, now is now]]. It reminds me of the essay ...

The movie, movie theater, and restaurant each link to entries in my References folder. In these reference notes I capture properties, my rating, and thoughts about that thing. I use Web Clipper to help populate properties from databases like IMDB. The quote was meaningful to me, so it became an evergreen note in my root folder. The essay I mention is in my Clippings folder, because I didn’t write it myself.

This heavy linking style becomes more useful as time goes on, because I can trace how ideas emerged, and the branching paths these ideas created.

Fractal journaling and random revisit

Fractal journaling and randomization are how I tame the wilderness that a knowledge base can grow into.

Throughout the day I use Obsidian’s unique note hotkey to write individual thoughts as they come up. This shortcut automatically creates a note with the prefix YYYY-MM-DD HHmm to which I may add a title that describes the idea.

Every few days I review these journal fragments and compile the salient thoughts. I then review those reviews monthly, and review the monthly reviews yearly (using this template). The result is a fractal web of my life that I can zoom in and out of at varying degrees of detail. I can trace back where individual thoughts came from, and how they bubbled up into bigger themes.

Every few months I set aside time for a “random revisit”. I use the random note hotkey to quickly travel randomly through my vault. I often use the local graph at shallow depth to see related notes. This helps me revisit old ideas, create missing links, and find inspiration in past thoughts. It’s also an opportunity to do maintenance, like fix formatting based on new rules in my personal style guide.

People have asked me if this could be automated with language models but I do not care to do so. I enjoy this process. Doing this maintenance helps me understand my own patterns. Don’t delegate understanding.

Properties and templates

Almost every note I create starts from a template. I use templates heavily because they allow me to lazily add information that will help me find the note later. I have a template for every category with properties at the top, to capture data such as:

  • Dates — created, start, end, published
  • People — author, director, artist, cast, host, guests
  • Themes — grouping by genre, type, topic, related notes
  • Locations — neighborhood, city, coordinates
  • Ratings — more on this below

A few rules I follow for properties:

  • Property names and values should aim to be reusable across categories. This allows me to find things across categories, e.g. genre is shared across all media types, which means I can see an archive of Sci-fi books, movies and shows in one place.
  • Templates should aim to be composable, e.g. Person and Author are two different templates that can be added to the same note.
  • Short property names are faster to type, e.g. start instead of start‑date.
  • Default to list type properties instead of text if there is any chance it might contain more than one link or value in the future.

The .obsidian/types.json file lists which properties are assigned to which types (i.e. date, number, text, etc).

Rating system

Anything with a rating uses an integer from 1 to 7:

  • 7 — Perfect, must try, life-changing, go out of your way to seek this out
  • 6 — Excellent, worth repeating
  • 5 — Good, don’t go out of your way, but enjoyable
  • 4 — Passable, works in a pinch
  • 3 — Bad, don’t do this if you can
  • 2 — Atrocious, actively avoid, repulsive
  • 1 — Evil, life-changing in a bad way

Why this scale? I like rating out of 7 better than 4 or 5 because I need more granularity at the top, for the good experiences, and 10 is too granular.

Publishing to the web

This site is written, edited, and published directly from Obsidian. To do this, I break one of my rules listed above — I have a separate vault for my site. I use a static site generator called Jekyll to automatically compile my notes into a website and convert them from Markdown to HTML.

My publishing flow is easy to use, but a bit technical to set up. This is because I like to have full control over every aspect of my site’s layout. If you don’t need full control you might consider Obsidian Publish which is more user-friendly, and what I use for my Minimal documentation site.

For this site, I push notes from Obsidian to a GitHub repo using the Obsidian Git plugin. The notes are then automatically compiled using Jekyll with my web host Netlify. I also use my Permalink Opener plugin to quickly open notes in the browser so I can compare the draft and live versions.

The color palette is Flexoki, which I created for this site. My Jekyll template is not public, but you can get similar results from this template by Maxime Vaillancourt. There are also many alternatives to Jekyll you can use to compile your site such as Quartz, Astro, Eleventy, and Hugo.

21 points | 13 comments | original link

Comments

Insanity | 2026-02-18 02:07 UTC
I tried Obsidian to build a “second brain”. But eventually just reverted back to notes on my iPad (handwritten) and Vim (markdown) for typed notes.

I actually think Obsidian is a great tool, but I just need something as low friction as possible to quickly jolt something down. Vim and Goodnotes does the trick for me.

ehnto | 2026-02-18 02:17 UTC
Same, all projects get a .notes folder where plain text goes. Home directory gets a .notes folder also. It helps to have good command over text based search tools.

There was an exception though, where text just didn't cut it, which was a brief period where I was importing vehicles from Japan and needed lots of images, documents and comparisons up on a big digital whiteboard. I used LogSeq for that.

timothyduong | 2026-02-18 02:19 UTC
Obsidian is amazing on my desktop environments but I shared the same sentiment with you, on mobile I use Apple Notes and transpose to Obsidian if its worth doing so...
ravenstine | 2026-02-18 02:23 UTC
I like the desktop app, but the android app is such ass. It's bad enough that I wonder why they even bother.
Brajeshwar | 2026-02-18 02:44 UTC
Similar to mine. I use Apple Notes for quick, ephemeral notes and for Shared Family Notes. If they are the ones that are more important, they go into the plain-text notes in the Obsidian folder.

The Notes folder(s) is sync with a Cloud Service. So, I use iA Writer[1] (a brilliant Notes App) to have a pleasant writing experience on other mobile devices. They are just Markdown, so I can open them in any Notes App that supports Markdown. I paid for iA Writer once, like 10+ years ago.

1. https://ia.net/writer

Jonovono | 2026-02-18 02:30 UTC
I really want to like obsidian but it’s just unusable (for me)

So I built my own thats a bit more lightweight. Think nvalt meets markdown. thats native, iOS and Mac with I cloud sync, and open source.

Check it out if it sounds interesting!

iOS app is still in review ;(

https://hashy.ink/

FireBeyond | 2026-02-18 02:37 UTC
> a bit more lightweight

I don't want to be overly negative, but no plugins are mandatory, there's no "47 step setup guide" unless you want to heavily customize.

And as far as I can tell you mostly replaced some of the weight with AI?

AI "Search Notes", "Organize Notes", "List and filter, tags", "Clean up notes"

I guess I just see this as weight in a different area? You've pushed a lot of the weight and plugins to cloud-based AI?

I am, on principle, very much a fan of "native app, not another Electron view".

Jonovono | 2026-02-18 02:41 UTC
It’s a BYOK so the ai is optional. (And if you really don’t want it it’s a package in the open source app that can easily be pulled out) Since it’s markdown and on filesystem you can just edit your notes with Claude code if you want similar to obsidian.

By lightweight I mean it’s not a super heavy and bloated electron app on desktop and a slow and janky capacitor app on mobile that takes 10 seconds to launch and that the project can be greppable in a day to build on

xnx | 2026-02-18 02:37 UTC
I Use Workflowy. The features it adds over plain text/markdown are worth the slight added complexity. I wish it was cheaper and supported tables, but I'll never got back to non-outlined notes.
Brajeshwar | 2026-02-18 02:38 UTC
I ~like~ love Obsidian. I also like Steph Ango and his philosophies. In fact, a lot of his ideas shaped and improved mine. His approach is opinionated.

So pick the good ones you like and make your own.

For instance, I’m pretty well-organized, and I like it that way. This leads me to native organizations using folders and some patterns that I learnt aloong the way. Nothing more complicated. One day, if I have to walk off Obsidian, I can, and I will still know where things are.

Right now, my organization is a loose combo of PARA[1] and Johnny Decimal.[2]

Obsidian is another tool; it just happens to be one hell of a good tool.

1. https://fortelabs.com/blog/para/

2. https://johnnydecimal.com

Simboo | 2026-02-18 02:38 UTC
Don’t over complicate this everyone.

This is the best file-explorer GUI ever made hands down.

All your files map 1-to-1 with the OS filesystem. No double clicking files over and over again. No getting lost in endless unsorted directories. Launch any file extension type straight from the same explorer GUI.

I use this app less as a second brain and more as a personal document vault. (Markdown is ugly sorry about it) I get lots of pdf’s and such so it’s all in one place.

Cool, end of speech. Peace out

alkz | 2026-02-18 02:40 UTC
good for you
afcool83 | 2026-02-18 02:44 UTC
Just for context, Steph Ango is the CEO of Obsidian. His approach to notetaking in his own app made the rounds in the PKM (personal knowledge management) community for how _counterintuitive_ it was.

He eschews a lot of the common wisdom pushed by influencers in this space who tout "the one true way™" to stay organized. File splattered in the root? Sure. Unresolved links to notes that don't exist and probably never will? Why not! Blank daily notes that aren't carefully manicured journal tomes? Heck yeah.

His point is "perfect is the enemy of good." You could carefully curate and perfect your pkm...or you could have a life.